Topic Parahoric Subgroups
topic admitted

Parahoric Subgroups

A parahoric subgroup of a reductive group \(G\) over a local field \(F\) is a compact open subgroup of \(G(F)\) attached to a facet (simplex) of the Bruhat-Tits building. Parahorics interpolate between the Iwahori subgroup (stabiliser of a chamber) and the hyperspecial maximal compact subgroup (stabiliser of an "optimal" vertex), and they index the natural categorification of Hecke algebra theory.

Definition

Let \(G\) be a connected reductive group over a non-archimedean local field \(F\) with valuation ring \(\mathcal{O}_F\) and residue field \(\mathbb{F}_q\). Let \(\mathcal{B}(G, F)\) be the Bruhat-Tits building.

For a facet \(F \subseteq \mathcal{B}(G, F)\) (a non-empty open simplex), the parahoric subgroup \(\mathcal{P}_F\) is the connected component of the identity in the stabiliser \(\mathrm{Stab}_{G(F)}(F)\) (in the category of group schemes via the Bruhat-Tits smooth model).

Equivalently: \(\mathcal{P}_F = G_F(\mathcal{O}_F)\) where \(G_F\) is a specific smooth affine \(\mathcal{O}_F\)-group scheme with generic fibre \(G\) (the parahoric group scheme of \(F\)).

Types of parahorics

Facet type Parahoric type Special features
Chamber (alcove) Iwahori subgroup \(I\) smallest parahoric; pro-\(p\) Iwahori is its maximal pro-\(p\) subgroup
Vertex (optimal) Hyperspecial \(\cong G(\mathcal{O}_F)\) for a smooth reductive model \(G/\mathcal{O}_F\); exists iff \(G\) is unramified
Vertex (general) Special maximal compact at that vertex; reductive quotient is "as large as possible"
General facet Standard parahoric between Iwahori and hyperspecial

For \(G = \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Q}_p)\):

  • Iwahori \(I\) = matrices that are upper-triangular mod \(p\);
  • Hyperspecial \(K_0 = \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}_p)\).

There are two conjugacy classes of hyperspecial vertices in the tree; each fixes a different end-class.

Reductive quotient

Each parahoric \(\mathcal{P}_F\) is a smooth affine group scheme over \(\mathcal{O}_F\). Its special fibre \(\bar{\mathcal{P}}_F\) (over \(\mathbb{F}_q\)) is a connected smooth affine group; its reductive quotient is \[ \bar{\mathcal{P}}_F^{\mathrm{red}} \;:=\; \bar{\mathcal{P}}_F \big/ R_u(\bar{\mathcal{P}}_F), \] a connected reductive group over \(\mathbb{F}_q\).

The reduction map \[ \mathcal{P}_F \;\twoheadrightarrow\; \bar{\mathcal{P}}_F^{\mathrm{red}}(\mathbb{F}_q) \] is the key tool for transferring representation theory of \(G(F)\) to representation theory of finite reductive groups.

Example: \(G = \mathrm{GL}_n\), hyperspecial vertex

\(\mathcal{P}_v = \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathcal{O}_F)\), with reductive quotient \(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)\).

Example: Iwahori \(I \subseteq \mathrm{GL}_n(F)\)

\(I\) = matrices in \(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathcal{O}_F)\) that are upper- triangular mod \(\pi\). Its reductive quotient is the diagonal torus \((\mathbb{F}_q^\times)^n\).

Example: Standard parahoric in \(\mathrm{GL}_n\)

For a composition \(n = n_1 + \cdots + n_k\), the corresponding standard parahoric \(P\) consists of block upper-triangular matrices (mod \(\pi\)) with block sizes \(n_1, \ldots, n_k\). Reductive quotient is \(\mathrm{GL}_{n_1}(\mathbb{F}_q) \times \cdots \times \mathrm{GL}_{n_k}(\mathbb{F}_q)\).

The pro-unipotent radical

The kernel \(\mathcal{P}_F^+\) of the reduction map is the pro-unipotent radical: \[ \mathcal{P}_F^+ \;=\; \ker(\mathcal{P}_F \twoheadrightarrow \bar{\mathcal{P}}_F^{\mathrm{red}}(\mathbb{F}_q)), \] a pro-\(p\) (where \(p\) = residue characteristic) normal subgroup. It is the \(p\)-adic analogue of the unipotent radical of a finite reductive parabolic.

Bruhat decomposition relative to parahoric

For an Iwahori \(I\): \[ G(F) \;=\; \bigsqcup_{\tilde w \in \tilde W} I \tilde w I. \]

For a general parahoric \(\mathcal{P}\) with Weyl subgroup \(W_{\mathcal{P}} \subseteq \tilde W\): \[ G(F) \;=\; \bigsqcup_{w \in W_{\mathcal{P}} \backslash \tilde W / W_{\mathcal{P}}} \mathcal{P} w \mathcal{P}. \]

Role in representations

  • Depth zero representations: irreducible reps of \(G(F)\) that have an invariant vector under some pro-unipotent radical \(\mathcal{P}_F^+\). Their classification reduces to representations of finite reductive groups \(\bar{\mathcal{P}}_F^{\mathrm{red}}(\mathbb{F}_q)\) (Moy-Prasad).
  • Types of Bushnell-Kutzko: each Bernstein component of \(\mathrm{Rep}(G(F))\) contains a "type" \((\mathcal{P}, \rho)\) with \(\mathcal{P}\) parahoric and \(\rho\) a representation; for \(\mathrm{GL}_n\) this gives the complete parameterisation of supercuspidals.
  • Hecke algebras: \(\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{P} \backslash G(F) / \mathcal{P})\) is a convolution algebra; for \(\mathcal{P} = I\), the Iwahori-Hecke algebra; for \(\mathcal{P}\) maximal compact, the spherical Hecke algebra (= Satake transform = \(\mathrm{Rep}(\hat G)\)).
  • Affine flag variety: \(G(F) / \mathcal{P}\) is the partial affine flag variety; the case \(\mathcal{P} = I\) gives the full affine flag variety, the case \(\mathcal{P}\) hyperspecial gives the affine Grassmannian.

Moy-Prasad filtration

For \(x \in \mathcal{B}(G, F)\) and \(r \ge 0\), Moy and Prasad defined a filtration \(\mathcal{P}_{x,r}\) by depth: \[ \mathcal{P}_{x,0} \;\supseteq\; \mathcal{P}_{x, 0^+} \;\supseteq\; \mathcal{P}_{x, r} \;\supseteq\; \cdots \] with successive quotients direct sums of finite-dimensional representations of finite reductive groups. The depth-zero subgroup recovers the parahoric; positive-depth quotients support types for positive-depth representations.

Mathlib

Not formalised. Even the basic Iwahori subgroup \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}_p)\) mod \(p\) would require local-field infrastructure beyond what is currently available.

References

  • Bruhat–Tits, Groupes réductifs sur un corps local I, II (Publ.\ IHES 1972, 1984).
  • Tits, Reductive groups over local fields (Corvallis 1979).
  • Moy–Prasad, Unrefined minimal K-types for p-adic groups (Inv.\ Math.\ 1994) and Jacquet functors and unrefined minimal K-types (Comment.\ Math.\ Helv.\ 1996).
  • Bushnell–Kutzko, The Admissible Dual of GL(N) via Compact Open Subgroups (Annals 1993).
  • Yu, Smooth models associated to concave functions in Bruhat-Tits theory (in: Autour des schémas en groupes, 2015).

Prerequisite Topics

Used by